Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for April 5th, 2012

Sunitha Rao R | TNN

Hundreds of citizens living safe and secure in their dream gated communities may be jolted to know that the BDA has suddenly woken up and has started redefining the term. The civic agency does not recognize these islands of privacy that have come up across the city. For the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike too these gated premises are illegal.
The civic agencies declare that these are nothing but unauthorized settlements and cannot be excluded from the rest of the city through a mere boundary wall.
But urban experts say that civic agencies have no right to comment as it is they who have issued occupation certificates. They say that these private layouts are no different from government quarters.
How did these layouts come about? “In our rulebook, there is no concept of gated communities. The developers take permission for the formation of layouts and construction of residential blocks. But they cannot block part of the layout from public access. That is not allowed in the laws and amounts to gross violation,” says BDA commissioner Bharata Lal Meena.
Every layout is required to earmark space for parks, roads and areas of common use, say authorities. These roads and parks come under the civic authorities, hence these communities can’t claim exclusivity, they say.
Builders do admit that there is no term called a gated community in the bylaws, developers use it for convenience purpose. Says Jayashankar BM, managing director, Adarsha Developers: “Even Confederation of Real Estate Developers’ Associations of India is clear on this.’’
He explains: “For a property measuring up to 20,000 sq mtr or 4.95 acres, a developer need not have to obtain a development plan. Only building plan is required. Once the building plan is obtained, the developer can build boundary walls and call it gated community. However, in the same property, if the builder develops a residential layout, then the roads will be relinquished with the civic agencies and it becomes a public road.’’
With the apapraent confusion on the definition of gated’, citizens are left with more questions than answers. Echoing the concerns of gated residents, Mainak Ray, investment banker, resident of Sri Ram Spandhana in Challaghatta, says: “When I came to Bangalore about eight years ago, I stayed in an independent house. But the reason I moved into a gated community is because of security and amenities. It might be called as a gated community, but for us outsiders, we find like-minded people living in our neighbourhood. I like to stay in a gated community for its cosmopolitan culture. Civic agencies must make provisions for gated communities.’’
But BDA chief Meena has no answer for them. He reiterates: “It is believed that many such communities take permission from the panchayats and obtain layout plan from the BDA.” What is their future? Will BDA take action? Meena’s reply may come as a relief to the residents. He says: `I don’t know what can be done if there are violations. It is left to the government.’’ Though BDA throws up its hands, here is a case where residents of a gated community off Kanakapura main road faced problems in 2010. BBMP had razed down the boundary wall of this gated community as it was blocking the road for the villages. The residents had questioned the builder, but got no answer and the wall is still not rebuilt. “We have made temporary security measures, but there is no concrete wall,’’ says John Sebastin (name changed), a resident.
sunitha.rao@timesgroup.com
WHAT are gated
communities? 

Every large apartment complex or cluster of villas can be described as gated community, given that these have defined entry and exit points

EXCLUSIVE LIVING: Palm Meadows in Mahadevapura is one of the gated communities that has come up in the city

Read Full Post »

Josy Joseph TNN

New Delhi: A media report about the movement of two Army units towards Delhi on the night of January 16-17, triggering fears of a challenge to civilian authority, set off an avalanche of denials on Wednesday, turning the spotlight on one of the worst kept secrets in the capital – the bitter factional feud in the top echelons of the Army.
Amid a chorus of denials to the Indian Express report from Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, defence minister A K Antony, the defence secretary, the ministry of defence and the Army, one relevant refutation came through: no notification was required to be given to the defence ministry for the movements of Hisar-based mechanized infantry unit and the Agra-based 50 Para brigade towards Delhi.
And if this was indeed the case, why did the movements create an alarm in the capital? On whose advice did government leaders come to believe that there might be something irregular about what was routine movement of army units to test their efficacy in fog conditions? That there was alarm seems to be borne out by the fact that the police were directed to raise barricades on the highway as part of what was called a counter-terror exercise. The objective was to slow down the movement of the two units.
The swiftness with which the police drill was set in motion has raised many eyebrows, considering the country can pride itself on its disciplined army with an unshakeable commitment to democracy. Open insubordination has not been considered a realistic risk even by conspiracy theorists. Many in the Capital wondered whether the government was alarmed because the information about the movements – rather, the alert – came from insiders who are generally considered to be reliable. The suspicions were raised because of the bitter factional battle which has raged in the army for a while.
The sharp differences, which have been the subject of discussion within the Army as well as the defence ministry for over two years, hit a new high over the row over the Army chief General V K Singh’s age, leaving an exasperated government scrambling to find ways to put a lid on the conflict, fearing that it might go out of hand.
IT IS OUT ON THE STREETS
ALARMING REPORT: A mechanised infantry unit based in Hisar (Haryana) started moving towards Delhi on Jan 16. A section of Agra-based 50 Para Brigade also moved towards the capital. Neither movement had been notified to the defence ministry, triggering alarm
These exercises are routine and happen periodically. There is no need for them to be notified to the def ministry
Shashikant Sharma | DEF SECY 
Such exercises are conducted from time to time. The reports are completely baseless and we categorically deny the same
Sitanshu Kar | DEF MINISTRY SPOKESMAN 
The report is a meticulous reconstruction and a very sober interpretation of the movement of two key Army units… investigated over six weeks… and draws on highly credible sources —Indian Express
These are alarmist reports. These should not be taken at face value
Manmohan Singh | PM
It (troop movement) is usual, natural activity… nothing unusual, and we are absolutely sure of the patriotism of Indian armed forces. We cannot have the luxury of these controversies
A K Antony | DEFENCE MINISTER

Read Full Post »